Estonia vs Lesotho: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 4.97 kg/ha against 4.81 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.16 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 131st and Lesotho ranks 128th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.54 kg/ha | 5.61 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 2.8 kg/ha | 3.49 kg/ha | 0.6966 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 2.8 kg/ha | 4.25 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 5.07 kg/ha | 4.62 kg/ha | 0.4538 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Estonia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 4.97 kg/ha against 4.81 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Estonia and Lesotho?
- 0.16 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lesotho?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Lesotho rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 131st and Lesotho ranks 128th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).