Ethiopia PDR vs Mongolia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 6.76 kg/ha against 6.74 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.13 kg/ha | 3.88 kg/ha | 0.2459 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 5.05 kg/ha | 4.53 kg/ha | 0.5188 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 6.63 kg/ha | 6.27 kg/ha | 0.3543 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 7.31 kg/ha | 5.59 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 6.76 kg/ha against 6.74 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Mongolia?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Mongolia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Mongolia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).