Fiji vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 8.13 kg/ha against 8.13 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.92 kg/ha | 4.32 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1970s | 6.37 kg/ha | 5.75 kg/ha | 0.6178 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 5.27 kg/ha | 5.7 kg/ha | 0.4234 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 3.85 kg/ha | 5.29 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 4.16 kg/ha | 5.09 kg/ha | 0.9319 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 7.23 kg/ha | 6.09 kg/ha | 1.14 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2020s | 7.73 kg/ha | 9.52 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Fiji or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 8.13 kg/ha against 8.13 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Fiji and Zimbabwe?
- 0 kg/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).