Finland vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Finland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 6.31 kg/ha against 5.91 kg/ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0.4 kg/ha.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 121st of 186 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.26 kg/ha | 5.29 kg/ha | 3.97 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2020s | 6.83 kg/ha | 5.82 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Finland or South Sudan?
- Finland, at 6.31 kg/ha against 5.91 kg/ha in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Finland and South Sudan?
- 0.4 kg/ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Finland and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Finland ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 121st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).