Georgia vs Sierra Leone: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 5.74 kg/ha against 5.45 kg/ha in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Georgia ranks 123rd and Sierra Leone ranks 126th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.36 kg/ha | 4.84 kg/ha | 0.5169 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 5.88 kg/ha | 5.24 kg/ha | 0.6319 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 5.58 kg/ha | 6.06 kg/ha | 0.4883 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 5.65 kg/ha | 6.29 kg/ha | 0.6434 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or Sierra Leone?
- Georgia, at 5.74 kg/ha against 5.45 kg/ha in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and Sierra Leone?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Sierra Leone rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 123rd and Sierra Leone ranks 126th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).