Georgia vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 5.91 kg/ha against 5.74 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 123rd and South Sudan ranks 121st of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.71 kg/ha | 5.29 kg/ha | 0.4182 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 5.65 kg/ha | 5.82 kg/ha | 0.1743 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 5.91 kg/ha against 5.74 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and South Sudan?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 123rd and South Sudan ranks 121st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).