Latvia vs Niger: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 8.39 kg/ha against 8.12 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 101st and Niger ranks 98th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.22 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | 7.79 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 7.22 kg/ha | 4 kg/ha | 3.22 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 6.46 kg/ha | 6.83 kg/ha | 0.3721 kg/ha | Niger |
| 2020s | 9 kg/ha | 8.08 kg/ha | 0.9196 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Latvia or Niger?
- Niger, at 8.39 kg/ha against 8.12 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Latvia and Niger?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Niger?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Niger rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 101st and Niger ranks 98th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).