Lithuania vs Malawi: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Malawi
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 12.84 kg/ha against 12.57 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 60th and Malawi ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.41 kg/ha | 5.08 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 8.77 kg/ha | 7.44 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 11.78 kg/ha | 10.7 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 13.23 kg/ha | 12.7 kg/ha | 0.531 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Lithuania or Malawi?
- Lithuania, at 12.84 kg/ha against 12.57 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Lithuania and Malawi?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Malawi rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 60th and Malawi ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).