Montenegro vs Singapore: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 4.54 kg/ha against 4.41 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.71 kg/ha | 6.02 kg/ha | 48.69 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 19.11 kg/ha | 5.83 kg/ha | 13.28 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 4.31 kg/ha | 4.84 kg/ha | 0.5273 kg/ha | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Montenegro or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 4.54 kg/ha against 4.41 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Montenegro and Singapore?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Singapore?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Singapore rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 137th and Singapore ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).