Nigeria vs Peru: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Nigeria
- Peru
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 11.93 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Nigeria ranks 61st and Peru ranks 62nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.1 kg/ha | 7.52 kg/ha | 3.42 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 4.66 kg/ha | 7.21 kg/ha | 2.55 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1980s | 5.87 kg/ha | 7.31 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1990s | 7.85 kg/ha | 7.45 kg/ha | 0.3974 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 10.53 kg/ha | 9.12 kg/ha | 1.41 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 11.7 kg/ha | 10.62 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 11.94 kg/ha | 11.63 kg/ha | 0.3136 kg/ha | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Nigeria or Peru?
- Nigeria, at 11.93 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Nigeria and Peru?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Peru rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Nigeria ranks 61st and Peru ranks 62nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).