Peru vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Peru
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Peru currently reports 11.92 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 62nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.52 kg/ha | 6.96 kg/ha | 0.5581 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 7.21 kg/ha | 9.83 kg/ha | 2.63 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 7.31 kg/ha | 10.9 kg/ha | 3.59 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 7.05 kg/ha | 10.22 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Peru or Yugoslav SFR?
- Peru, at 11.92 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Peru and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0 kg/ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Peru and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Peru ranks 62nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).