Sri Lanka vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Sri Lanka
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 12.05 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 60th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.62 kg/ha | 6.96 kg/ha | 5.35 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 2.05 kg/ha | 9.83 kg/ha | 7.79 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 2.81 kg/ha | 10.9 kg/ha | 8.08 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 2.71 kg/ha | 10.22 kg/ha | 7.51 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Sri Lanka or Yugoslav SFR?
- Sri Lanka, at 12.05 kg/ha against 11.92 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Sri Lanka and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Sri Lanka and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Sri Lanka ranks 60th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).