Afghanistan vs Ghana: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 103,315 t against 96,281 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 7,034 t.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 35th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 6 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 45,484 t | 7,710 t | 37,774 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 51,458 t | 8,162 t | 43,296 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 57,480 t | 11,273 t | 46,208 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 55,139 t | 21,140 t | 33,999 t | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 67,945 t | 33,606 t | 34,339 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 90,969 t | 64,275 t | 26,694 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 91,869 t | 95,139 t | 3,270 t | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 103,315 t against 96,281 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Ghana?
- 7,034 t, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Ghana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Ghana rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 35th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).