Afghanistan vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 96,281 t against 90,889 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 5,392 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 38th of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 45,484 t | 57,785 t | 12,301 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 51,458 t | 79,047 t | 27,588 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 57,480 t | 85,053 t | 27,573 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 53,596 t | 78,383 t | 24,786 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Yugoslav SFR?
- Afghanistan, at 96,281 t against 90,889 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Yugoslav SFR?
- 5,392 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Afghanistan and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 38th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).