Algeria vs Uganda: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Algeria
- Uganda
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 75,178 t against 71,072 t in Uganda, a difference of 4,106 t.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 48th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,617 t | 15,488 t | 9,128 t | Algeria |
| 1970s | 25,984 t | 24,401 t | 1,583 t | Algeria |
| 1980s | 31,490 t | 38,642 t | 7,152 t | Uganda |
| 1990s | 44,581 t | 48,646 t | 4,065 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 66,855 t | 59,702 t | 7,154 t | Algeria |
| 2010s | 83,372 t | 67,186 t | 16,185 t | Algeria |
| 2020s | 80,851 t | 71,180 t | 9,671 t | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Algeria or Uganda?
- Algeria, at 75,178 t against 71,072 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Algeria and Uganda?
- 4,106 t, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Uganda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Algeria ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 48th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).