Angola vs Sri Lanka: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Angola
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 30,934 t against 30,291 t in Angola, a difference of 643 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 186 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,122 t | 2,919 t | 5,203 t | Angola |
| 1970s | 8,552 t | 3,966 t | 4,586 t | Angola |
| 1980s | 5,998 t | 5,311 t | 686.6 t | Angola |
| 1990s | 7,470 t | 6,051 t | 1,419 t | Angola |
| 2000s | 12,694 t | 10,180 t | 2,514 t | Angola |
| 2010s | 23,800 t | 20,636 t | 3,164 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 29,033 t | 28,888 t | 144.88 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Angola or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 30,934 t against 30,291 t in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Angola and Sri Lanka?
- 643 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Angola ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).