Argentina vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Argentina
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 90,889 t against 86,501 t in Argentina, a difference of 4,388 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 40th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 38th of 185 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 102,193 t | 57,785 t | 44,407 t | Argentina |
| 1970s | 135,970 t | 79,047 t | 56,924 t | Argentina |
| 1980s | 128,083 t | 85,053 t | 43,031 t | Argentina |
| 1990s | 103,881 t | 78,383 t | 25,498 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Argentina or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 90,889 t against 86,501 t in Argentina as of 1991.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Argentina and Yugoslav SFR?
- 4,388 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Argentina and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Argentina ranks 40th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 38th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).