Armenia vs Costa Rica: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 5,462 t against 4,557 t in Armenia, a difference of 905 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Armenia ranks 117th and Costa Rica ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,678 t | 4,636 t | 957.79 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 4,619 t | 4,398 t | 220.74 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 5,656 t | 5,481 t | 175.37 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 4,040 t | 5,479 t | 1,439 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 5,462 t against 4,557 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 905 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Costa Rica rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 117th and Costa Rica ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).