Armenia vs Mauritania: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 4,908 t against 4,557 t in Armenia, a difference of 351 t.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 117th and Mauritania ranks 115th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,678 t | 2,258 t | 1,420 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 4,619 t | 2,161 t | 2,458 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 5,656 t | 3,368 t | 2,288 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 4,040 t | 4,339 t | 298.43 t | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 4,908 t against 4,557 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Mauritania?
- 351 t, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mauritania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Mauritania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 117th and Mauritania ranks 115th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).