Australia and New Zealand vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen

Australia and New Zealand
206,682 t
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
226,603 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
19th
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
5th

Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 226,603 t against 206,682 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 19,921 t.

That makes Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 5th of 186 countries.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Iran (Islamic Republic of) Difference Ahead
1960s 30,634 t 49,369 t 18,735 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1970s 33,904 t 62,937 t 29,033 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1980s 54,036 t 67,662 t 13,626 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1990s 72,184 t 130,277 t 58,093 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2000s 90,037 t 186,634 t 96,597 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2010s 136,746 t 203,797 t 67,051 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2020s 170,247 t 227,587 t 57,340 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Australia and New Zealand or Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 226,603 t against 206,682 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Australia and New Zealand and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
19,921 t, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/australia-and-new-zealand/iran-islamic-republic-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/australia-and-new-zealand/iran-islamic-republic-of/">Australia and New Zealand vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).