Australia vs Myanmar: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Australia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Australia currently reports 200,528 t against 194,881 t in Myanmar, a difference of 5,647 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.
Australia ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,605 t | 62,048 t | 33,443 t | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 31,062 t | 66,741 t | 35,678 t | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 49,738 t | 98,610 t | 48,871 t | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 67,538 t | 96,003 t | 28,466 t | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 85,340 t | 136,220 t | 50,880 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 131,210 t | 177,912 t | 46,702 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 163,855 t | 190,534 t | 26,678 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Australia or Myanmar?
- Australia, at 200,528 t against 194,881 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Australia and Myanmar?
- 5,647 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Myanmar rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Australia ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).