Azerbaijan vs Guatemala: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Azerbaijan
- Guatemala
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 37,542 t against 34,757 t in Guatemala, a difference of 2,785 t.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 68th and Guatemala ranks 70th of 185 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,820 t | 4,465 t | 11,355 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 23,924 t | 7,540 t | 16,383 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 28,110 t | 19,032 t | 9,079 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 36,781 t | 32,472 t | 4,309 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan or Guatemala?
- Azerbaijan, at 37,542 t against 34,757 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan and Guatemala?
- 2,785 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Guatemala?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Guatemala rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Azerbaijan ranks 68th and Guatemala ranks 70th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).