Bangladesh vs Ethiopia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bangladesh
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 344,236 t against 285,232 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 59,004 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 126,941 t | 73,402 t | 53,538 t | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 160,144 t | 108,537 t | 51,607 t | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 210,713 t | 242,643 t | 31,930 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 269,633 t | 340,171 t | 70,538 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Bangladesh or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 344,236 t against 285,232 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Bangladesh and Ethiopia?
- 59,004 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Ethiopia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Bangladesh ranks 15th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).