Belarus vs Middle Africa: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 136,065 t against 134,471 t in Belarus, a difference of 1,594 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 28th and Middle Africa ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Middle Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78,841 t | 51,272 t | 27,569 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 95,402 t | 71,546 t | 23,856 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 122,242 t | 121,920 t | 321.4 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 130,625 t | 133,774 t | 3,150 t | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Middle Africa?
- Middle Africa, at 136,065 t against 134,471 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 1,594 t, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Middle Africa rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 28th and Middle Africa ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).