Belarus vs Oceania: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 213,542 t against 134,471 t in Belarus, a difference of 79,071 t.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.6 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 31st and Oceania ranks 29th of 201 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78,841 t | 79,541 t | 699.95 t | Oceania |
| 2000s | 95,402 t | 95,418 t | 15.84 t | Oceania |
| 2010s | 122,242 t | 143,493 t | 21,251 t | Oceania |
| 2020s | 130,625 t | 177,214 t | 46,589 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 213,542 t against 134,471 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Oceania?
- 79,071 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Oceania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Oceania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 31st and Oceania ranks 29th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).