Belgium-Luxembourg vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 34,480 t against 33,082 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,398 t.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,246 t | 5,029 t | 19,218 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 26,767 t | 10,041 t | 16,726 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 25,160 t | 14,313 t | 10,847 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 32,064 t | 16,915 t | 15,149 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Belgium-Luxembourg or Zimbabwe?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 34,480 t against 33,082 t in Zimbabwe as of 1999.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Belgium-Luxembourg and Zimbabwe?
- 1,398 t, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Zimbabwe?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 72nd and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).