Belize vs Bhutan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belize
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 1,325 t against 1,191 t in Belize, a difference of 134 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Belize ranks 154th and Bhutan ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 204.49 t | 778.93 t | 574.44 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 280.38 t | 919.72 t | 639.35 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 309.93 t | 1,035 t | 724.67 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 455.67 t | 1,060 t | 604 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 596.88 t | 1,492 t | 895.21 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 815.6 t | 1,300 t | 484.09 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 1,145 t | 1,244 t | 99.04 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Belize or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 1,325 t against 1,191 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Belize and Bhutan?
- 134 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Bhutan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Bhutan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Belize ranks 154th and Bhutan ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).