Bhutan vs Lebanon: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bhutan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 1,740 t against 1,325 t in Bhutan, a difference of 415 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.3 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Bhutan ranks 141st and Lebanon ranks 138th of 185 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 778.93 t | 1,198 t | 419.1 t | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 919.72 t | 1,455 t | 534.96 t | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 1,035 t | 1,336 t | 301.84 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 1,060 t | 2,144 t | 1,085 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 1,492 t | 1,848 t | 355.93 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 1,300 t | 1,868 t | 568.22 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 1,244 t | 1,835 t | 590.57 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Bhutan or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 1,740 t against 1,325 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Bhutan and Lebanon?
- 415 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Lebanon rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Bhutan ranks 141st and Lebanon ranks 138th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).