Burundi vs Latvia, Republic of: Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- Latvia, Republic of
How they compare
Latvia, Republic of currently reports 11,118 t against 9,223 t in Burundi, a difference of 1,895 t.
That makes Latvia, Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia, Republic of ahead.
Burundi ranks 101st and Latvia, Republic of ranks 98th of 185 countries.
Latvia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Latvia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,912 t | 13,452 t | 6,540 t | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2000s | 5,880 t | 7,685 t | 1,806 t | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 7,031 t | 8,090 t | 1,059 t | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 8,869 t | 12,261 t | 3,391 t | Latvia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen, Burundi or Latvia, Republic of?
- Latvia, Republic of, at 11,118 t against 9,223 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen between Burundi and Latvia, Republic of?
- 1,895 t, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Latvia, Republic of?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Latvia, Republic of rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 101st and Latvia, Republic of ranks 98th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).