Cabo Verde vs Caribbean: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Caribbean
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 53,496 t against 65.68 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 53,430 t.
That makes Caribbean's figure about 814.5 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Caribbean ranks 28th of 29 countries.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Caribbean | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 105.53 t | 31,537 t | 31,432 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 77.68 t | 44,984 t | 44,906 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 97.86 t | 52,217 t | 52,119 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 66.27 t | 44,116 t | 44,049 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 92.87 t | 48,106 t | 48,013 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 76.14 t | 53,215 t | 53,139 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 63.48 t | 51,184 t | 51,120 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Caribbean?
- Caribbean, at 53,496 t against 65.68 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Caribbean?
- 53,430 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Caribbean?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Caribbean rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Caribbean ranks 28th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).