Cabo Verde vs Czechoslovakia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 144,630 t against 65.68 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 144,564 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 2,202.2 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Czechoslovakia ranks 26th of 29 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 105.53 t | 103,398 t | 103,293 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 77.68 t | 143,298 t | 143,220 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 97.86 t | 166,741 t | 166,643 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 68.68 t | 165,423 t | 165,354 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 144,630 t against 65.68 t in Cabo Verde as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Czechoslovakia?
- 144,564 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cabo Verde and Czechoslovakia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Czechoslovakia ranks 26th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).