Canada vs Philippines: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Canada
- Philippines
How they compare
Canada currently reports 112,075 t against 97,334 t in Philippines, a difference of 14,741 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 35th and Philippines ranks 37th of 201 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 171,899 t | 18,802 t | 153,097 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 209,528 t | 28,787 t | 180,741 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 237,336 t | 47,871 t | 189,466 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 287,644 t | 60,566 t | 227,078 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 373,187 t | 77,266 t | 295,921 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 375,010 t | 94,452 t | 280,559 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 159,568 t | 97,392 t | 62,176 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Canada or Philippines?
- Canada, at 112,075 t against 97,334 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Canada and Philippines?
- 14,741 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Philippines rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Canada ranks 35th and Philippines ranks 37th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).