Caribbean vs Malawi: Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Caribbean
- Malawi
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 53,496 t against 52,806 t in Malawi, a difference of 690 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 61st of 201 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31,537 t | 8,162 t | 23,375 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 44,984 t | 10,621 t | 34,363 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 52,217 t | 10,632 t | 41,585 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 44,116 t | 12,538 t | 31,577 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 48,106 t | 24,503 t | 23,603 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 53,215 t | 40,924 t | 12,291 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 51,184 t | 53,125 t | 1,941 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen, Caribbean or Malawi?
- Caribbean, at 53,496 t against 52,806 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen between Caribbean and Malawi?
- 690 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Malawi rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Caribbean ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 61st of 201 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).