Central America vs Kazakhstan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central America
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Central America currently reports 561,270 t against 222,454 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 338,816 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 2.5 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 18th of 29 groups.
Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 319,155 t | 178,617 t | 140,538 t | Central America |
| 2000s | 368,578 t | 187,514 t | 181,064 t | Central America |
| 2010s | 423,416 t | 211,065 t | 212,350 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 530,821 t | 235,264 t | 295,557 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Central America or Kazakhstan?
- Central America, at 561,270 t against 222,454 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Central America and Kazakhstan?
- 338,816 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Kazakhstan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Central America ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 18th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).