Chile vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 16,867 t against 15,219 t in South Sudan, a difference of 1,648 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 89th and South Sudan ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19,007 t | 13,708 t | 5,299 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 17,163 t | 14,580 t | 2,582 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Chile or South Sudan?
- Chile, at 16,867 t against 15,219 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Chile and South Sudan?
- 1,648 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Chile ranks 89th and South Sudan ranks 91st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).