China, Hong Kong SAR vs Grenada: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen

China, Hong Kong SAR
14.62 t
in 2023
Grenada
13.37 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
171st
Grenada rank
174th

Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Grenada
050100150196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 14.62 t against 13.37 t in Grenada, a difference of 1.25 t.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 171st and Grenada ranks 174th of 186 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Grenada Difference Ahead
1960s 122.29 t 68.4 t 53.89 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 76.8 t 50.06 t 26.74 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 54.1 t 33.98 t 20.12 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 36.48 t 18.61 t 17.87 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 28.85 t 17.22 t 11.62 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 21.03 t 16.8 t 4.23 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 14.74 t 14.53 t 0.2071 t China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, China, Hong Kong SAR or Grenada?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 14.62 t against 13.37 t in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between China, Hong Kong SAR and Grenada?
1.25 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Grenada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Grenada rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 171st and Grenada ranks 174th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Grenada: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/china-hong-kong-sar/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-nitrogen/china-hong-kong-sar/grenada/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Grenada: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).