Colombia vs Rwanda: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Colombia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 16,994 t against 15,466 t in Colombia, a difference of 1,528 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 102nd and Rwanda ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,780 t | 8,220 t | 19,560 t | Colombia |
| 1970s | 35,244 t | 11,264 t | 23,979 t | Colombia |
| 1980s | 34,664 t | 13,941 t | 20,723 t | Colombia |
| 1990s | 22,884 t | 11,371 t | 11,513 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 9,447 t | 15,503 t | 6,056 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 5,410 t | 18,460 t | 13,051 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 13,581 t | 17,454 t | 3,873 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Colombia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 16,994 t against 15,466 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Colombia and Rwanda?
- 1,528 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Rwanda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Colombia ranks 102nd and Rwanda ranks 100th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).