Costa Rica vs Honduras: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 5,856 t against 5,462 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 394 t.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 114th and Honduras ranks 112th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,691 t | 3,752 t | 2,061 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 3,029 t | 5,099 t | 2,070 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 4,059 t | 9,249 t | 5,189 t | Honduras |
| 1990s | 4,626 t | 9,782 t | 5,156 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 4,398 t | 4,579 t | 180.94 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 5,481 t | 4,446 t | 1,035 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 5,479 t | 5,553 t | 73.58 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 5,856 t against 5,462 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Honduras?
- 394 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Honduras rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 114th and Honduras ranks 112th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).