Croatia vs Finland: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 14,191 t against 10,668 t in Croatia, a difference of 3,523 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.3 times Croatia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 99th and Finland ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,351 t | 21,309 t | 8,958 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 13,187 t | 22,819 t | 9,631 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 13,736 t | 20,814 t | 7,079 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 11,914 t | 15,348 t | 3,434 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Finland?
- Finland, at 14,191 t against 10,668 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Finland?
- 3,523 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Croatia ranks 99th and Finland ranks 96th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).