Cuba vs Nicaragua: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 29,186 t against 27,938 t in Cuba, a difference of 1,248 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 78th of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,216 t | 12.21 t | 11,203 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 23,846 t | 18.23 t | 23,827 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 32,035 t | 33.5 t | 32,002 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 26,609 t | 104.49 t | 26,505 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 30,915 t | 194.59 t | 30,721 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 31,690 t | 9,026 t | 22,664 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 27,065 t | 24,882 t | 2,183 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 29,186 t against 27,938 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Nicaragua?
- 1,248 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Nicaragua rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 78th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).