Czechia vs Philippines: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 97,334 t against 91,246 t in Czechia, a difference of 6,088 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 40th and Philippines ranks 37th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89,963 t | 61,104 t | 28,859 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 72,585 t | 77,266 t | 4,681 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 75,183 t | 94,452 t | 19,269 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 88,025 t | 97,392 t | 9,367 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 97,334 t against 91,246 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Philippines?
- 6,088 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Philippines?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Philippines rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 40th and Philippines ranks 37th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).