Czechoslovakia vs Romania: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Romania
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 144,630 t against 129,033 t in Romania, a difference of 15,597 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 29th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 103,398 t | 63,960 t | 39,439 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 143,298 t | 99,791 t | 43,507 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 166,741 t | 122,585 t | 44,156 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 165,423 t | 108,423 t | 56,999 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Romania?
- Czechoslovakia, at 144,630 t against 129,033 t in Romania as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Romania?
- 15,597 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Romania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Romania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 29th and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).