Eastern Africa vs Ethiopia: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eastern Africa
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 951,670 t against 344,236 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 607,434 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 2.8 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Eastern Africa has been ahead every year.
Eastern Africa ranks 16th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 29 groups.
Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 332,271 t | 73,402 t | 258,869 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2000s | 437,246 t | 108,537 t | 328,709 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2010s | 737,409 t | 242,643 t | 494,766 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 942,447 t | 340,171 t | 602,276 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Eastern Africa or Ethiopia?
- Eastern Africa, at 951,670 t against 344,236 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Eastern Africa and Ethiopia?
- 607,434 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Ethiopia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Eastern Africa ranks 16th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).