Ecuador vs Serbia, Republic of: Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 28,263 t against 25,980 t in Serbia, Republic of, a difference of 2,283 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia, Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia, Republic of ahead.
Ecuador ranks 80th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 82nd of 185 countries.
Serbia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,799 t | 29,217 t | 12,418 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 21,139 t | 31,394 t | 10,255 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 26,420 t | 26,523 t | 103.65 t | Serbia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Serbia, Republic of?
- Ecuador, at 28,263 t against 25,980 t in Serbia, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Serbia, Republic of?
- 2,283 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia, Republic of?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 80th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 82nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).