Ecuador vs Turkmenistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 29,461 t against 28,263 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1,198 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 80th and Turkmenistan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,420 t | 25,702 t | 8,282 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 16,378 t | 36,273 t | 19,895 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 21,139 t | 36,028 t | 14,889 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 26,420 t | 39,801 t | 13,381 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 29,461 t against 28,263 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 1,198 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Turkmenistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 80th and Turkmenistan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).