Eswatini, Kingdom of vs Luxembourg: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini, Kingdom of
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Eswatini, Kingdom of currently reports 1,662 t against 1,495 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 167 t.
That makes Eswatini, Kingdom of's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 140th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini, Kingdom of averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini, Kingdom of | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,452 t | 1,473 t | 20.46 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,607 t | 1,549 t | 58.43 t | Eswatini, Kingdom of |
| 2020s | 1,693 t | 1,590 t | 103.07 t | Eswatini, Kingdom of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini, Kingdom of or Luxembourg?
- Eswatini, Kingdom of, at 1,662 t against 1,495 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini, Kingdom of and Luxembourg?
- 167 t, with Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini, Kingdom of and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini, Kingdom of and Luxembourg rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 139th and Luxembourg ranks 140th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).