Georgia vs Oman: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 2,510 t against 2,480 t in Georgia, a difference of 30 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 141st and Oman ranks 139th of 201 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,820 t | 377.04 t | 5,443 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 4,529 t | 374.11 t | 4,154 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2,661 t | 782.19 t | 1,879 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 2,477 t | 2,191 t | 285.58 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Oman?
- Oman, at 2,510 t against 2,480 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Oman?
- 30 t, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Oman?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Oman rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 141st and Oman ranks 139th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).