Guadeloupe vs Qatar: Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guadeloupe
- Qatar
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 259.95 t against 210.23 t in Qatar, a difference of 49.72 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guadeloupe has been ahead every year.
Guadeloupe ranks 169th and Qatar ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Guadeloupe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 589.34 t | 4.9 t | 584.44 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 541.83 t | 16.21 t | 525.62 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 376.38 t | 40.82 t | 335.56 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 317.26 t | 88.45 t | 228.81 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 293.45 t | 118.71 t | 174.74 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 259.95 t | 108.61 t | 151.34 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2020s | 259.95 t | 178.7 t | 81.25 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen, Guadeloupe or Qatar?
- Guadeloupe, at 259.95 t against 210.23 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen between Guadeloupe and Qatar?
- 49.72 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guadeloupe and Qatar rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland nitrogen?
- Guadeloupe ranks 169th and Qatar ranks 170th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).