Guinea-Bissau vs Iceland: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1,151 t against 1,098 t in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 53 t.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 143rd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 585.78 t | 616.26 t | 30.48 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 561.22 t | 453.21 t | 108.02 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1980s | 853.45 t | 669.48 t | 183.96 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1990s | 1,017 t | 585.62 t | 431.03 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 844.26 t | 746.49 t | 97.77 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 945.27 t | 1,060 t | 114.96 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1,044 t | 1,499 t | 454.72 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Guinea-Bissau or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1,151 t against 1,098 t in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Guinea-Bissau and Iceland?
- 53 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Iceland rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 143rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).