Hungary vs Kenya: Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen
Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Hungary
- Kenya
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 88,248 t against 78,772 t in Kenya, a difference of 9,476 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 42nd and Kenya ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 41,116 t | 23,566 t | 17,550 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 63,540 t | 28,214 t | 35,326 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 83,743 t | 39,174 t | 44,569 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 65,804 t | 44,440 t | 21,364 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 63,292 t | 44,960 t | 18,332 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 72,949 t | 63,420 t | 9,529 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 77,338 t | 73,092 t | 4,246 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen, Hungary or Kenya?
- Hungary, at 88,248 t against 78,772 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen between Hungary and Kenya?
- 9,476 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Kenya rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland nitrogen?
- Hungary ranks 42nd and Kenya ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).